I often return to this image, which I took in 2022 in Jambi, Indonesia. At first glance, it seems to capture something hopeful: a full-circle rainbow arcing over a lush green landscape. But look closer, and you’ll see what lies beneath the beauty: a vast oil palm plantation, carved out of what was once native rainforest.
For me, the photo encapsulates one of the central paradoxes we face in environmental journalism: the coexistence of wonder and loss, resilience and destruction, all in the same frame.
The deeper we go into environmental journalism, the more paradoxes we encounter. At Mongabay, we sit with a particularly difficult one: The more intimately we understand the scale of ecological loss, the harder it becomes to stay hopeful. Yet the people living closest to the crisis are often the ones imagining the boldest futures.
Our work demands precision. It requires us to report on vanishing rainforests, vanishing species, vanishing time. To bear witness to lives uprooted by mining, by heat, by flood. To document not just data, but grief. There is no room to look away.
And yet, only reporting on what’s broken isn’t enough. A steady drumbeat of devastation can numb readers, or worse, convince them that nothing can be done. That’s where the other side of the paradox comes in. When we highlight real-world responses — stories of reforestation, Indigenous leadership, coral restoration, and agroecology — we don’t dilute the truth; we expand it. We show that amid the unraveling, people are still choosing to protect what they love.
This is the premise of our solutions journalism: that spotlighting success doesn’t deny the crisis. It helps prevent burnout, fuels action, and fosters resilience. It’s not about cheerleading or false optimism. It’s about documenting the full picture of what’s happening, including what’s working, so that others might learn, replicate, or support it.
The people we interview often embody this paradox. A park manager in Indonesia rewilding a degraded forest without recognition. A fisher in Madagascar rebuilding local governance structures without external financial incentives. A scientist in Colombia restoring trust between communities and conservation, without formal support. They carry loss in one hand and possibility in the other. They keep going not because they’re certain of victory, but because not trying would be a deeper betrayal.
Their stories — and the solutions they point to — are not afterthoughts. They are strategies for survival. They are how we stitch meaning back into the work, especially when the data alone feels too heavy to hold.
Hope, then, is not the opposite of truth. It is what allows us to live with truth without giving up. In amplifying what’s working, we give readers — and ourselves — permission to keep imagining, and building, a future still worth fighting for.
Banner image: A full-circle rainbow arcing over a vast oil palm plantation in Jambi, Indonesia, carved out of what was once native rainforest. Image by Rhett A. Butler/Mongabay.
Credits
This story first appeared on Mongabay
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and Mongabay, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
