The AB Inbev-SABMiller merger, which is worth more than U.S. $100 billion, was held up on Thursday as an example of action by South Africa’s competition authorities that had transformed a transaction that was set to benefit a group of shareholders into a deal designed to benefit society at large.
Talking to the African News Agency (ANA) on the sidelines of the 10th annual Competition Law, Economics & Policy Conference in Cape Town on Thursday, South Africa’s Minister of Economic Development, Ebrahim Patel, said: “When it was first announced … we said we were not excited about the deal.”
He said it was clear that shareholders would benefit from the transaction, but “we saw no value proposition for South Africa”.
Patel noted that the authorities’ interest in a developmental outcome was further magnified by the fact that SABMiller already had an effective monopoly in South Africa.
“They were by far the largest producer and distributor of beer in SA,” he said. “AB Inbev was simply taking over an existing monopoly.”
So the challenge was put to AB Inbev to re-engineer the deal in a way that there would be positive benefits for South Africa. Patel said a few areas, including employment, were identified.
It was also decided, the minister added, that ways needed to be found to stimulate employment outside of the beer brewing sector.
“That led to an agreement where the company is putting R1 billion on the table to develop local suppliers.”
Currently the beer brewing industry in South Africa is a net importer of hops and barley, the inputs that go into beer. This should soon change thanks to a challenge the competition authorities gave AB Inbev in place of a simple nod of approval for their merger.
“The challenge we gave AB Inbev, the challenge they have accepted, is over the next few years to work to bring small-scale farmers into the supply chain,” said Patel.
As a result, AB Inbev has promised to bring 800 new small-scale farmers into the production of beer inputs. At the end of this period, the minister added, the aim is for South Africa to be a net exporter of the inputs that go into beer in the form of value-added malt.
“The state needs to see mergers as opportunities to advance a broader programme,” said Patel.
He said the country’s law specifically said you have to look at whether a proposal is pro-competitive. It also requires that questions be asked about whether a proposal would lead to growth, would it be good for development, would it benefit small business, local industries, employment?
In the SAB Miller-AB Inbev case, Patel said, “we found an agreement that is significantly better than had there been simply an approval without conditions”.
South Africa Today – South Africa News