Youth from various education districts in Limpopo have raised serious concerns over alleged corruption and favoritism in the employment of Education Assistants (EAs) under Phase Five of the Basic Education Employment Initiative (BEEI). The initiative, part of the Presidential Employment Stimulus, aims to create 200,000 job opportunities for young people aged 18 to 34 (including those turning 35 by March 2026). However, complaints have emerged that School Governing Body (SGB) members and teachers are bypassing fair processes to hire relatives and friends.
Irregular Appointments Nullified at Lajani Primary School
At Lerajani Primary School in Mohlaletsi, outside Jane Furse, the circuit manager nullified the employment of eight EAs after discovering that the child of an SGB member and a teacher’s child were among those hired. Six of the dismissed EAs, who had already signed contracts, claim the termination was unfair, insisting they followed proper procedures.
“We were employed on June 6, but just three days later, we were told to stop working,” said one affected EA. “They said our contracts were terminated because procedures weren’t followed, yet we underwent shortlisting, interviews, and appointments. This violates labor laws.”
Similar Claims in Marumofase Village
In Marumofase village near Tzaneen under the Mopani District, rejected applicants are demanding a rerun of the hiring process after the wife of the SGB chairperson was allegedly appointed. Although she was later removed following an internal probe, applicants argue the entire process was tainted.
“Some of us were asked to pay bribes for jobs,” said a frustrated youth. “Relatives of SGB members and teachers were prioritized. We demand a fresh process with a new panel.”
Department Responds
The Limpopo Education Department stated it has not received formal complaints but urged aggrieved parties to submit written grievances with evidence. Meanwhile, the acting director of the Sekhukhune East District confirmed that irregularly appointed EAs would be terminated and paid only for days worked.
“Upon investigation, we found two parents were part of the shortlisting panel—one recused during their child’s interview, but the damage was done,” the official said.
The allegations have cast doubt on the fairness of the EA hiring system, with youth activists calling for a transparent review to ensure equal opportunities. As the controversy unfolds, many young job seekers remain disillusioned, fearing that merit continues to be overshadowed by nepotism.
