Will trade bans stop a deadly salamander plague from invading the US?

If it happens, it’ll likely go something like this: American parents decide to buy something special for their child’s birthday – a pet salamander. Although immediately excited, the child quickly loses interest and the salamander languishes. The parents tire just as rapidly. One night, they let it loose outside, telling their child it escaped. The salamander, little-prepared for the world beyond the terrarium, quickly perishes. But it leaves something behind: spores of the deadly Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) fungus. A decade later, salamander species in the U.S. are in crisis; populations are plummeting as the fungus spreads, some species are believed totally gone. Extinction is marching across the land.

In an effort to stem this eco-tragedy, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) published a rule in January 2016 that banned 201 species of salamander from being imported into the U.S. under the Lacey Act. But now some scientists — given new information about the spread of Bsal and its potential carriers — say this ban doesn’t go nearly far enough.

“This deadly disease has the potential to wipe out entire species. More needs to be done to protect salamanders and other wildlife from international trade,” says Tiffany Yap, a staff scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) who specializes in amphibian disease.

She calls the USFWS listing “momentous” but no longer up to speed with current scientific findings.

Others, including some herp (reptile and amphibian) hobbyists believe the USFWS rule may go too far and a different approach is necessary.

At stake

In 2008, scientists started noticing populations of fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra) were vanishing from the wild in Western Europe. Five years later they were able to officially describe the culprit, until then unknown to science: Bsal — a fungal disease that literally eats the skin off salamanders. Closely related to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which scientists have implicated in hundreds of declines and at least a few extinctions in frog species worldwide, Bsal appears to only affect salamanders. Where it has hit — in parts of the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany — the fungus has wiped out up to 99.9 percent of fire salamanders.

Researchers believe the European outbreak is directly connected to the international pet trade. Scientists point to an animal that was imported in 2010 that three years later tested positive for Bsal as at least indirect evidence that the first Bsal in Europe likely arrived via the pet trade. Research indicates Bsal stems from Asia, and salamander species there have evolved resistance to the disease after millions of years of co-evolution. European species have not — and lab studies have shown that many U.S. species are also vulnerable.

Scientists now fear the same fungal outbreak could wipe out salamanders across the U.S. — if it arrives and gains a foothold. A recent effort, testing 10,000 salamanders across the U.S., fortunately found no evidence of Bsal, but it would only take one animal under a worst-case-scenario to change that.

The debate over Bsal isn’t a debate over the science; it’s not a debate over how threatening the fungal disease might be for North America’s salamander species — everyone agrees that it could have a very destructive impact.

“We take the threat very seriously,” said Robert Likins, vice president of government affairs at the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC). “If Bsal were to become established in North America the results could be devastating.”

PIJAC is the world’s largest pet trade association, lobbying for pet-favorable laws across the U.S.

The debate is really to what extent we should go to prevent it from happening and what’s the best strategy. It’s a debate about the legalities around pet ownership and the strength and effectiveness of various regulations.

How far do we go?

When the USFWS banned 201 salamander species – about a third of all species – from being imported into the U.S., it was largely seen by scientists as a much-needed measure to do our utmost to prevent Bsal from getting onto North American shores. They did this by listing these species as “injurious wildlife” under the Lacey Act, a conservation law that regulates the trade in animals or plants.

Salamanders are strange. They’re strange not just because they can breathe through their skin, or because they can regenerate long limbs, or because they have a super long genome. Salamanders are biological oddities because they are found in their greatest diversity not in the rainforests of the Amazon or the tropics of Southeast Asia, but in the deciduous, temperate, and subtropical forests of the eastern U.S. Unlike trees, beetles, birds, frogs or most terrestrial family you can think of, the salamander doesn’t really prefer the tropics. Indeed, of the 600-700 species found worldwide, around 25 percent of them are found in the U.S. The U.S. includes representatives from all families of salamanders with the exception of one – Hynobiidae, or primitive Asian salamanders. The U.S. hosts a particularly large number of species that belong to Plethodontidae, a family that scientists think is one of the most susceptible to Bsal.

However, PIJAC felt the USFWS was taking the wrong strategy in banning so many salamanders. In 2015, PIJAC recommended an immediate and voluntary ban on the Chinese firebelly newt (Cynops orientalis) and the paddletail newt (Pachytriton labiatus), both from China, in a bid to keep Bsal out. But Likins says PIJAC does not support the current ban because it “does not provide a mechanism for being lifted if an effective detection and treatment regimen is developed.”

He added that “we do not believe that the USFWS has the authority under [the Lacey Act] to ban vectors, making this an issue better handled by USDA.”

But a year before the ruling, two conservation groups, the CBD and SAVE THE FROGS! actually petitioned the USFWS to go much further: ban all live salamander imports, regardless of species.

“There are 10 families of salamanders, consisting of 68 genera, and over 700 species,” said the CBD’s Tiffany Yap. “They have not all been tested yet, and it’s possible that species that have not yet been tested could be susceptible to and/or effective carriers of Bsal.”

Scientists have since discovered that a new Bsal fungal spore can survive for up to 30 days in the water or air and may even survive on the feet of water birds, potentially traveling from waterway to waterway with ease.

“These discoveries help to explain how Bsal can spread across landscapes and suggest that it will be extremely difficult to eradicate it since non-susceptible species act as reservoir species,” reads a letter to the USFWS from a dozen experts about expanding the ban to all salamanders and frogs.

One of these experts was Reid Harris, the Director of International Disease Mitigation at Amphibian Survival Alliance. Calling Bsal, an “existential” threat to North American salamanders, he agrees with Yap that all salamanders need to be added to the banned list. He says he doesn’t know of a “mechanism” to add new species to the list when new information comes out, but “there are a lot more data now.”

Not just salamanders

Last year, news hit that changed the debate even further. Researchers discovered Bsal in a frog species in the pet trade in Germany. Testing 36 small-webbed fire-bellied toads (Bombina microdeladigitora) imported from Vietnam to Germany, researchers found that three of them tested positive for Bsal. This is a major deal because it means some frog species — no one knows how many — could also potentially carry Bsal to the North America.

“Now that we know frogs are potential vectors, the strongest action would be to ban all salamander and frog imports,” Yap said.

In their letter, the dozen experts also argue for a total ban on all amphibians, frogs and salamanders.

“Until proven otherwise, the precautionary principle suggests that all amphibian species should be considered carriers,” Harris said.

PIJAC’s Likins did not say specifically if they would support an expanded ban.

“Our position is that bans, moratoriums, or public policy in general should be based on sound science,” Likins said. “If research demonstrates that a species poses a significant risk then we would support restrictions on import until an effective testing and treatment regimen can be developed.”

Kurt Schatzl, the president and environmental law analyst of the New England Herpteological Society, said that “most herpetocultural hobbyists appear to feel that a total ban is overkill.”

“It’s been my experience…that governments love to ban things because it’s easy to do,” he added. “When you ban something, anything, you don’t really need to know much. If you decide to regulate something, you’ll need to know what you’re talking about and you open yourselves up to criticism if things go badly. A ban is a complete prohibition, which is easily accomplished and easily enforced…[But] a ban does nothing to address the conservation issues all amphibians are currently facing.”

However, not all hobbyists agree.

Chris Smith, the Conservation Committee Chair for the Minnesota Herpetological Society, says that his group’s 300-plus members have a very “diverse mix of opinions on regulations surrounding herpetofauna.” But in general the group supports “efforts to conserve and protect amphibians and reptiles,” including efforts to keep Bsal out.

He notes that given the presentations and talks at the monthly meeting, MHS members are “better informed on the topic than the general public.”

The USFWS was unwilling to comment directly on the question of increasing the moratorium to cover all salamanders and frogs, but instead focused on the current ruling.

Craig Martin, USFWS Chief of the Branch of Aquatic Invasive Species, said the organization is now reviewing both “peer and public comments” in order to move from the interim rule, put in place in 2016, to a final one. He adds that the “interim rule has no sunset clause.” In other words, at this point the ban on 201 salamander species could be indefinite.

When asked to comment on the new regulations and the debate, Petco, North America’s second largest pet store, said they don’t sell salamanders or newts. However, they do sell several frog species including the oriental fire-bellied toad (Bombina orientalis), which is in the same genus as the fire-bellied toads that were found to harbor Bsal in Germany.

“Impacts of Bsal for our breeders is a concern and our breeders have done testing to ensure they are not impacted,” said Jonathan Williamson, vice president of animal care and education at Petco.

When asked directly if that meant they test every frog for Bsal and Bd, Williamson avoided answering directly but said: “Petco’s top priority is always the health and well-being of animals. We have what we believe are the industry’s strongest standards for animal health and welfare. We require all Petco live animal vendors to pass a rigorous certification process and each vendor has strict biosecurity measures in place.“

Clean trade

Where scientists and hobbyists appear to agree is that the best thing going forward would be quickly establishing a so-called “clean trade.” What that means is every single amphibian — salamander or frog — would be tested before being allowed into the U.S. If the animal was found to be infected it would then be treated. Both Reid and Yap say a clean trade would be the optimal solution.

This may sound onerous, but Europe has already implemented one. Every animal coming into the continent is now tested via PCR, a molecular test using skin swab. Others, depending on the numbers incoming, are treated by simply turning the heat up on the amphibians to 25 Celsius (77 Fahrenheit) for ten days — which wipes out the fungal spores.

“Europeans are light years ahead of us in the exotic reptile and amphibian hobby so it’s no surprise they’ve already worked this through,” Schatzl said.

Likins with PIJAC says that “testing high risk species for high risk diseases makes sense, testing everything for everything does not.” He also notes that many amphibians in the U.S. are domestically bred and contests “there is no danger” that they will have Bsal.

Schatzel agrees. “Captive ancillary breeding populations of these animals are the only assurance against extinction in a world where money always trumps wildlife,” he said.

An Martel, a researcher at Ghent University specializing in Bsal, says that even Europe should go further by testing all captive populations across the continent, no matter when they arrived.

“The best way to prevent a disease in a pet from affecting wild populations is to ensure that pets are not released into the wild,” says Likins who notes that his organization has an effort called Habitude that helps people find the best pet for their lifestyle, hopefully decreasing the likelihood of people releasing pets into the wild.

The Minnesota Herpetological Society, like many herpetological groups, is a “resource” for any unwanted reptiles or amphibians, according to Smith.

Of course, it’s impossible to make sure every pet owner does the right thing. And even if it were, things go wrong, pets escape. Even throwing water from a salamander or frog cage outside could be perilous because that water could contain Bsal spores.

Moreover, even the best trade laws can’t ensure complete security from Bsal. Illegal trade remains a “concern,” says Reid Harris. Illegal, or unregulated trade, for pets poses a major issue and threat to many species, according to recent research.

“Education…should help reduce illegal trade since no one who is interested in pet salamanders and frogs wants to be the one to introduce Bsal and cause a salamander apocalypse,” Harris noted.

Should Bsal reach the shores of the U.S., Harris says the North American Bsal Task Force has established a rapid response plan to “give us a chance to contain the spread.”

But?

“Keeping Bsal out of North American would be the best solution.”

 

Banner image: A Shenandoah salamander (Plethodon shenandoah), a U.S. species researchers think is susceptible to Bsal infection. Image by Brian Gratwicke via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0).

Feedback: Use this form to send a message to the editor of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.