CAPE TOWN — The Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) has formally respected the Western Cape High Court’s recent interdict halting the Section 89 impeachment process against President Cyril Ramaphosa. The ruling temporarily suspends Parliament’s Impeachment Committee proceedings pending the President’s application to review the Independent Panel’s report, which previously found he had a case to answer regarding allegations of theft at his Phala Phala farm.
In a recent media engagement, the IFP’s Chief Whip Nhlanhla Hadebe addressed the party’s stance on the court’s decision, emphasizing the organization’s unwavering commitment to constitutional democracy and the rule of law. The spokesperson confirmed that the IFP respects both the judgment of the court and the fundamental independence of the judiciary.
While acknowledging that the ruling may temporarily affect the continuation of the Section 89 process, the IFP’s Chief Whip stressed that this does not diminish Parliament’s constitutional obligation to exercise oversight and ensure accountability in accordance with the Constitution and applicable legal processes.
The party indicated it will carefully study the judgment and its implications for the ongoing work of the impeachment committee. Moving forward, the IFP pledged to continue participating constructively in any subsequent parliamentary processes, strictly subject to the court’s directives.
“We remain committed to ensuring that all constitutional processes are conducted lawfully, fairly, and with due regard for the integrity of Parliament and the constitutional rights of all parties,” the IFP’s Chief Whip stated. The spokesperson further reiterated the party’s support for the principle that accountability and constitutional governance must always prevail within the framework of the law.
When pressed on the overarching principle of holding the president accountable to the public, the IFP’s Chief Whip emphasized a methodical, step-by-step approach. The party highlighted its consistent involvement in the impeachment proceedings thus far, noting that the IFP has actively participated in all foundational stages of the committee’s work. This includes the initial establishment of the committee, the drafting of its terms of reference, and the appointment of both the evidence leader and the assistant evidence leader.
The IFP maintains that Parliament must take the process one step at a time, guided by legal parameters. Ultimately, the party reaffirmed its core belief that the executive, including the President, must be held accountable by Parliament on behalf of the people of the Republic, ensuring that constitutional governance remains intact throughout the legal review.
