The Democratic Alliance (DA) in Gauteng has accused Premier Panyaza Lesufi’s provincial government of diverting funds from essential services to revive the controversial Nasi Ispani job creation programme. The DA claims that money meant for poverty alleviation projects, including school uniforms, sanitary pads, and food parcels, has been repurposed to finance the initiative—a claim Lesufi has dismissed.
Dispute Over Job Programme’s Revival
The Nasi Ispani programme, aimed at providing temporary employment to young people, has reignited tensions between the provincial government and the opposition. Premier Lesufi defended the project, arguing that even short-term jobs are crucial in a struggling economy.
“A half a loaf of bread is better than nothing,” Lesufi said in a recent statement. “Should we sentence young people to poverty because we’re criticised for creating temporary jobs? These opportunities give them experience and income.”
However, DA Gauteng social development spokesperson Refiloe Ntsekhe countered that the programme lacks sustainable skills development. “Sweeping streets isn’t a skill that makes someone employable elsewhere,” she said.
Allegations of Diverted Funds
Ntsekhe cited legislative records showing that R48 million was redirected from social development projects—including school uniforms, dignity packs for girls, and food parcels—to fund Nasi Ispani last year. She warned that further cuts could harm vulnerable groups.
“We can’t sacrifice schoolchildren who need uniforms or girls who miss classes without sanitary pads,” Ntsekhe said. “The MEC admitted the department lacks funds, so where will the money come from this time?”
Government’s Response
Lesufi maintained that funding comes from multiple sources, including the national Department of Labour and the Department of Education. He emphasized that the programme has provided jobs for over 32,000 young people, despite its temporary nature.
DA’s Next Steps
The DA plans to challenge the provincial government through parliamentary processes, demanding transparency on the 40,000 new jobs announced. Ntsekhe has submitted questions to the legislature, seeking clarity on budget allocations and potential service cuts.
As the debate intensifies, the clash highlights broader tensions over fiscal priorities in Gauteng, where job creation and social welfare remain contentious issues.
