Russia's Entry to Int'l Coalition in Syria Possible 'on Absolutely Equal Terms'

0

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Moscow joining the Western coalition in Syria is only possible if it stands on a level playing field with the United States, Vladimir Dzhabarov, first deputy chairman of Russia’s upper house of parliament, said Thursday.

“A broad coalition [in Syria] would be an ideal solution, if there were no flagman represented by one country, like the United States in the current coalition. We must participate on the absolutely equal terms there,” Dzhabarov said during a video-link between Russian and Egyptian parliamentarians devoted to the settlement of the Syrian crisis, organized by the Rossiya Segodnya International Information Agency.

He added that the parties to the coalition should not consider the removal of Syrian President Bashar Assad as a workable solution for the nation’s conflict.

“It is not viable. We will never agree on this,” Dzhabarov stressed.

On Sunday, UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson wrote in an article for The Telegraph newspaper that Moscow should “make a sensible compromise,” withdraw its support for Assad and join the US-led international coalition fighting Daesh. He also characterized the Syrian crisis as an opportunity for Russia to develop more productive relations with US President Donald Trump.

On April 12, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at a press conference after a meeting with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, that Russia was not betting on the success of any specific person, including Assad, in the settlement in Syria.

The US-led coalition of 68 nations started to carry out airstrikes against Daesh in Syria and Iraq in 2014, with the strikes in Syria not being authorized by the government of President Bashar Assad or the UN Security Council.

Russia has been conducting a counter-terrorist campaign in Syria since September 30, 2015, at Assad’s request.

© Photo: Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

Sputnik News

South Africa Today – World News – Middle East

Disclaimer: The views of authors published on South Africa Today are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of South Africa Today. By viewing, visiting, using, or interacting with SouthAfricaToday.net, you are agreeing to all the provisions of the Terms of Use Policy and the Privacy Policy.