Explained: Why Belarus Hasn’t Faced Massive Spike in Deaths Despite Lack of Coronavirus Lockdowns

0

Close to three weeks after Victory Day on May 9, and more than a month after Orthodox Easter celebrations and Belarus’s annual large-scale ‘community labour’ day events on April 19 and 25, the republic’s sanitary inspection agency is predicting a gradual decline in the number of new COVID-19 cases after reaching a plateau.

Belarus has become somewhat of an oddity over its decision to defy the European consensus of instituting lockdowns to try to curb the spread of the coronavirus, joined only by Sweden in refusing to implement strict restrictions. In Belarus, factories and farms, schools, shops, restaurants and other public amenities have remained open all this time, and authorities have urged (but not forced) the public to take individual precautionary measures such as social distancing and the wearing of medical masks in public places.

Western observers scolded Minsk over its decision not to cancel mass events, warning that the festivities would soon cause an inevitable massive spike in infection rates.

Weeks later, however, data released by the country’s epidemiological authorities has shown that infection rates remain steady, failing to top 1,000 new cases on any day since April 19, when large-scale testing began.

As of Friday, Belarus has carried out over 512,000 COVID-19 tests, equivalent to roughly 5.3 percent of its population of 9.4 million, with total cases topping 40,700, or about 0.4 percent of the population, and 224 people succumbing to coronavirus-related complications.

If these figures are correct, this means that despite the lack of lockdowns, Belarus’s infection rates are comparable to those of nations which have instituted tough restrictive measures, including Spain, Belgium, the United States, Italy, and the United Kingdom.

What About Mortality?

In terms of COVID-19 mortality, Belarus boasts some of the lowest figures in the world among nations with large-scale infection rates. Among 49 countries where 10,000 or more people have been confirmed infected, Belarus ranks 45th, behind only countries like Kuwait, Qatar, and Singapore, small nations with warm climates, in terms of deaths per capita. At the same time, Belarus has fewer reported deaths than South Korea and Denmark, where 3.5 times fewer people have been infected, as well as Israel and Japan, which have reported 2.3 times fewer cases.

By total mortality, just 0.5 percent of those infected succumb to COVID-19-related complications in Belarus, equivalent to a death rate of 21 people per one million, which is leagues ahead of developed Western European nations like Belgium (812 deaths per million), Spain (597 deaths per million), the UK (550 deaths per million), Italy (542 deaths per million), and France (420 deaths per million).

Critics have questioned Belarus’s methodology, accusing Minsk of covering up or otherwise manipulating its statistics somehow or resorting to the tired cliches about the country’s status as “the last dictatorship in Europe.”

However, covering up large numbers of dead people is impossible, not only because it is an automatic felony that would lead to lawsuits from families, but because doing so would have immense political consequences, particularly in Belarus, where presidential elections are set to take place in August.

So what accounts for Belarus’s low coronavirus mortality? For starters, it may have to do with the country’s decision many years ago to not to dismantle its Soviet-era medical system, including its specialized structure of epidemiological defence.

In March, Natalya Zhukova, the Belarusian Ministry of Health’s Chief Sanitary Doctor, explained to reporters that Belarus’s district, regional or city-level hospitals are staffed with doctors specializing in epidemiology, while larger regional and republican-level health centers contain an entire separate unit known as the ‘department of especially dangerous infections’. For decades, doctors in this department have been dealing with the organization of preventative measures in the event of an infectious diseases-related emergency.

“These are small units which are maintained on constant standby,” Zhukova explained at the time.

Sputnik
Medical worker in Minsk tests woman who contacted a COVID-19 positive person for coronavirus. May 25, 2020.

On top of that, Belarus’s medical system contains an army of 38,000 doctors and 115,000 other medical personnel, as well as 75,600 beds and 2,000 ventilators among its 599 hospitals, meaning enough capacity for every 1 in 124 Belarusians to be treated in hospital at any one time, and 41 doctors per 10,000 inhabitants (for comparison, according to World Health Organization data, the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy have 24.5, 28.1, 33 and 37.6 physicians per 10,000 inhabitants, respectively).

This week, President Alexander Lukashenko announced that the coronavirus infection situation in Belarus had stabilized, and that part of Minsk’s hospital network that was previously committed specifically to fighting the virus was no longer needed and would resume operating as normal.

Woman leaves specialized infectious diseases hospital in Minsk where many COVID-19 patients have been treated since the start of the outbreak.
Sputnik
Woman leaves specialized infectious diseases hospital in Minsk where many COVID-19 patients have been treated since the start of the outbreak.

When all is said and done, Belarus’s unique approach to handling the pandemic seems to demonstrate that more than anything, nations’ coronavirus mortality rates depend not as much on lockdown measures as they do on the effective functioning of their medical systems.

Earlier this month, President Lukashenko warned ministers that he would hold them personally responsible for any spikes in mortality, since, while the numbers of infection will sooner or later be forgotten, “the people who’ve died, but whom we could have saved but did not save will be remembered.”

 


©
Sputnik / Виктор Толочко



Sputnik News

South Africa Today – World News – Europe

Disclaimer: The views of authors published on South Africa Today are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of South Africa Today. By viewing, visiting, using, or interacting with SouthAfricaToday.net, you are agreeing to all the provisions of the Terms of Use Policy and the Privacy Policy.