Turnaround on Madonsela’s ‘state capture’ report

African News Agency (ANA)

Turnaround on Madonsela’s ‘state capture’ report
ANC chairwoman Baleka Mbete

National Assembly Speaker Baleka Mbete on Saturday distanced herself from a statement issued by Parliament on the decision to return former public protector Thuli Madonsela’s “state capture” report, claiming the statement was “grossly inaccurate”.

“This morning [Saturday] ANC chief whip cde Jackson Mthembu had discussion with the Speaker of the National Assembly Ms Baleka Mbete regarding the purported decision to return the report handed to her by former public protector adv Thuli Madonsela for safekeeping until the new public protector comes into office,” Mthembu’s office said in a statement.

“The speaker has categorically distanced herself from the grossly inaccurate statement issued by the parliamentary communications services as its contents neither represent her view nor her instruction to the staff of Parliament on the matter,” it said.

Mbete had confirmed that indeed the report, as requested, was currently being kept under lock and key in Parliament and would be handed over to incoming Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane without delay when she assumed office on Monday.

“The speaker’s handling of the matter in this regard is appropriate and is accordingly fully supported and appreciated by us. We are disappointed by the inaccurate statement by an official in the parliamentary communications services which created an erroneous notion in the media that the speaker has outrightly declined to take custody of the report,” Mthembu’s office said.

On Friday night, Parliament said in a statement Mbete was returning the final report given to her on Friday by Madonsela on investigations into allegations of state capture by the wealthy and politically-connected Gupta family.

In the statement Parliament said Mbete received a letter from Madonsela on Friday requesting that she preserve and keep the report safe until her successor assumes office.

“The Speaker has an obligation in terms of the rules of the assembly to table all documents received for the information of Members [of Parliament] in order to ensure that the business of the assembly is conducted in an open and transparent manner. This report however cannot be handled in the same manner,” Parliament said.

“The report will accordingly be returned to the office of the public protector.”

According to the statement, Madonsela described the report as an “investigation into complaints of alleged improper and unethical conduct by the president and other state functionaries relating to alleged improper relationships and involvement of the Gupta family in the removal and appointment of ministers and directors of state owned entities (SOEs) resulting in improper and possibly corrupt award of state contracts and benefits to the Gupta family’s businesses”.

On Friday afternoon, Madonsela told a press conference in Pretoria that she gave Mbete the report for safekeeping.

“Clause B [of Friday’s High Court ruling by Judge Dawie Fourie] says the report shall be preserved and kept in safekeeping. That is not an interim report, that is my final report,” Madonsela said at a briefing at Public Protector House in Pretoria.

“We have given it to the Speaker of Parliament for safekeeping.”

Earlier on Friday, the High Court in Pretoria heard that Madonsela would not be releasing her much anticipated report on allegations of state capture.

Azhar Bham, for the public protector, told Judge Fourie that even though the report had been finalised and signed off, Madonsela had taken the decision not to release it on Friday “only as a courtesy to the court”.

Fourie issued a “preservation order”, which means the findings of the report cannot be made public and the report has to be kept in “safekeeping”. He postponed the matter to November 1.

Opposition parties, including the Congress of the People, Democratic Alliance, Economic Freedom Fighters, and the United Democratic Movement had joined the court case, opposing Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs Minister Des van Rooyen’s applications to interdict Madonsela from releasing the report.

Madonsela left the office on Friday as her seven-year term came to an end. She had earlier in the week announced that she would release her preliminary report into allegations of “state capture” by the controversial Gupta family.

The Guptas have been accused of influencing the appointment of cabinet ministers — a prerogative of the president — and other senior government officials in order to benefit their business concerns.

President Jacob Zuma, who has strong ties to the Gupta family, on Thursday applied for an interdict to halt the release of the report. This came three days after he demanded an undertaking from Madonsela that she would not wrap up her investigation until he had been allowed to question other witnesses in the investigation.

Zuma asked for more time and complained that he was given two days’ notice before Madonsela interviewed him last Thursday, and was expected to give evidence on matters of which he was not forewarned when she requested the meeting.

Madonsela had indicated that she would release the report on Friday, but has since said on advice from her legal team she would not be doing so.

She, however, insists Zuma has had enough time, since March 22 this year, to answer her questions on the Gupta’s alleged influence on the state.

Zuma and Van Rooyen have come under fire for interdicting Madonsela, with political parties and analysts accusing them of panicking and applying delaying tactics in the midst of possible damning findings.

South Africa Today – South Africa News

SOURCEAfrican News Agency (ANA)